📊 7.2 Interactive Game: Naming Documents
Welcome to this fun and interactive game designed to help you practice the PMWC approach to naming documents!
Like
Be the first to like this
You don't have access to this course
We're sorry… To find out how to get access, contact us at hello@wildhub.community
Current course
FLEXIBLE LEARNING Feb 2025: Project Management for Wildlife ConservationThis page is for learners who are doing the FLEXIBLE, online-only self-paced course, with NO live Zoom sessions. Only Flexible learners can see this page. If you are signed up to the Guided course with live Zoom sessions, you WILL NOT be able to access this page - check your welcome and Week 1 emails for details on how to access your course materials. Want to sign up to the Flexible course? Learn more and register here: WildTeam conservation courses.
Current module (7/10)
7: Admin Processes
-
🎥 7.1 Video: Admin Processes - Part 1 By WildTeam Admin
-
📊 7.2 Interactive Game: Naming Documents By WildTeam Admin
-
🎥 7.3 Video: Admin Processes Part 2 By WildTeam Admin
-
🎥 7.4 Meetings: love them or hate them? By WildTeam Admin
-
📊 7.5 Exercise: Managing Meetings By Liane Fulford
-
🎯 7.6 Kahoot Quiz: Understanding Admin Processes By WildTeam Admin
Next module
8: Documents
Although it seems silly, I can definitely see how document naming could be contentious. This convention works well if everyone has access to a shared document that can be edited live because nobody would need to update the document name to indicate they had provided suggestions; they could just write their edits in comments and track changes, and the producer would create the new version when they go back in to respond to the suggestions. It could get trickier if the document needed to leave the organization, where the reviewer might create their own version with their initials in the document name before sending it back, and the producer would end up with multiple copies of the same document with different reviews. I think the best guidance is having one producer who can manage the versions if and when reviewers or others get off track with the selected naming convention.