Which category below best describes the type of organisation you currently work for/or run?
Academic or Research Institute
Areas of expertise
Land/Water ManagementMonitoring and evaluationProject/programme managementResearchSpecies Management
Would you like to be added to the calendar invitation for our monthly WildHub Socials?
Unsure, I would like more information about these socials
Are you currently signed up for one of our WildTeam training courses? Please select "No" if you are not signed up, or choose the course you are registered for below.
We’re thrilled to have you join our community. Your impressive field experience with Project Cheetah. From camera trap image analysis and VHF/GPS tracking to health assessments and kill event documentation, it brings a wealth of practical knowledge that will enrich our collective learning.
Your strong academic foundation in environmental and ecological sciences, combined with your passion for science-based monitoring and conservation. We’re excited to see how your skills and insights will contribute to advancing conservation approaches globally.
In your view, what is the biggest challenge in balancing cutting‑edge technology with traditional ecological knowledge when it comes to wildlife conservation?
We look forward to learning from your journey and collaborating with you as you continue to grow within this network.
Welcome aboard! 🌍
Thank you for the warm welcome. In my view the biggest challenge in balancing cutting edge technology with traditional ecological knowledge in wildlife conservation is integration without marginalization. Advanced tools like GPS collars, camera traps and remote sensing provide precise, large-scale data but they can sometimes overshadow the deep and place based understanding held by local communities and field researchers. Traditional ecological knowledge captures long-term patterns of animal behavior, seasonal movements and human wildlife interactions that technology alone may miss. The challenge lies in ensuring that technology complements rather than replaces this knowledge and that local stakeholders are actively involved in data interpretation and decision making and when technology is implemented without community engagement it can lead to mistrust, misinformed management decisions or conflict. So a balanced approach where scientific tools validate, refine and then build traditional insights offers the most effective and socially sustainable path forward for wildlife conservation.
Recent Comments
@Naveen Kumar Hello,
We’re thrilled to have you join our community. Your impressive field experience with Project Cheetah. From camera trap image analysis and VHF/GPS tracking to health assessments and kill event documentation, it brings a wealth of practical knowledge that will enrich our collective learning.
Your strong academic foundation in environmental and ecological sciences, combined with your passion for science-based monitoring and conservation. We’re excited to see how your skills and insights will contribute to advancing conservation approaches globally.
In your view, what is the biggest challenge in balancing cutting‑edge technology with traditional ecological knowledge when it comes to wildlife conservation?
We look forward to learning from your journey and collaborating with you as you continue to grow within this network.
Welcome aboard! 🌍
Thank you for the warm welcome. In my view the biggest challenge in balancing cutting edge technology with traditional ecological knowledge in wildlife conservation is integration without marginalization. Advanced tools like GPS collars, camera traps and remote sensing provide precise, large-scale data but they can sometimes overshadow the deep and place based understanding held by local communities and field researchers.
Traditional ecological knowledge captures long-term patterns of animal behavior, seasonal movements and human wildlife interactions that technology alone may miss. The challenge lies in ensuring that technology complements rather than replaces this knowledge and that local stakeholders are actively involved in data interpretation and decision making and when technology is implemented without community engagement it can lead to mistrust, misinformed management decisions or conflict. So a balanced approach where scientific tools validate, refine and then build traditional insights offers the most effective and socially sustainable path forward for wildlife conservation.