About Adam Barlow

I help run a UK charity that builds the capacity of conservationists to plan, implement, monitor, and report on their work. I also have a fair bit of experience in tiger and sea turtle conservation.

Which category below best describes the type of organisation you currently work for/or run?

Charity/Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO)

Areas of expertise

Behaviour change campaigns Education & training Species Management

Would you be willing to be approached and share your lessons learned in your area(s) of expertise with our community?


Influencer Of

Popular Content

Recent Conversations

Recent Comments

Sep 04, 2023

Great article - so good to hear insights about whats happening in Nigeria. 

Jun 22, 2023


Jun 14, 2023

Interesting to read - thanks Arvind. As the media live off sensation I like the idea of giving them other/less harmful sensational messages.

Jun 06, 2023

Thank you, Adam.

I 10000% support every word you put into the article above. I can see it every day and experience (partially) every month (somebody fundraises for salaries) too.

Thanks @Valeriia van der Westhuizen . is a hard road but worth it in the end!

Jun 06, 2023
Replying to Grace Alawa

Thank you Adam for this post, it's evergreen. Like nature, most startups take time but with discipline, consistency, fuelled by your vision; it's better to make your drop of contribution in conservation. It's either way right but personally I would rather live with the satisfaction of trying and see how it goes.  

thanks Grace - totally agree - you never know if you don't try!

Jun 05, 2023
Replying to Ghyslain Mabaya

I'm interested. Can I have more details

Hi Ghyslain - all the details should be in the links. Cheers, adam

May 26, 2023

Welcome Faisal!

May 11, 2023
Replying to Carolyn J Henri

I am curious to know how well this course acknowledges and directly addresses the decolonization of interactions with local stakeholders. 

Hi Carolyn,

I feel like you have spotted something important that can help us do better - but I can't yet understand what it is from what you have said. Anything further you could add would be most appreciated and I would like to continue this conversation here and talk about any faults we may have and how to fix them. But if you don't have time I totally understand. In case you do, here is some more info on our approach to this important issue, o that you may better advise us on how we can do things better.

Knowledge/experience base: In the last year I have been learning about decolonisation of conservation from the available literature but I do not have a lived experience on what it is like to be a conservationist in/from a country with a colonial history. Because of this lack of lived experience we decided that we could not very well address this issue on our current team's knowledge/experience base so we looked for and were lucky enough to recruit a trustee with such knowledge and experience to help guide us on what we do to address this issue. However, we recognize we have a lot more to learn in this area. 

Values/approach: As a team our passion is to provide our training and community support to those that want it but cannot access it for cost or other reasons. We recognise that conservationists from countries with a colonial past face additional internal and external systemic barriers to their career progression and have less opportunities to be involved in and lead conservation efforts. That is why we are actively seeking out such conservationists to provide them with full training bursaries and peer-to-peer community support. In essence we want to help empower these conservationists so that they have the means to lead /decide upon conservation efforts in their countries. Because we are focused on supporting these conservationists in this way, we are focusing our conservation fundraising efforts on that to make it possible. Having said all that, despite what we think we are doing right we may well have unconscious biases that influence how we see and tackle this problem.

Language: I am aware that stakeholder is an offensive term for some groups and why it is offensive. For that reason I was keen to find another, more acceptable term. But the best I could find was "interested parties" but it seems this term is so rarely used or understood that using it would create barriers for conservationists wanting to find, use, and talk about the skill set we are offering in this area. If there is a better and widely used term that we can use I would be grateful to hear suggestions. There may also be other instances in how we talk about conservation (e.g. "conservation" itself being a loaded term for some groups) that is not ideal.

Overall, from my understanding, it seems like the sector is in a transition phase between how conservation was carried out in the past to how it will be carried out in the future in a more equitable and inclusive way. While in this transition period we are trying to do our small part to help speed that along with the resources we have available. We may be good, bad or somewhere in between about how we are approaching that but we are doing our best and we are not complacent. Your message was saying that we need to do more. I totally agree - if you can help guide us on how to do more then we will get there faster. Otherwise please know that we are educating ourselves and getting there as fast as we can in the absence of such guidance and in the absence of complete solutions to the various problems associated with this topic.