Hi everyone, I wanted to share a quick update and a small ask 😊 Our LinkedIn presence has been growing really well lately — we’ve gained over 500 new followers in the past three months! This is a great opportunity to expand our reach and bring more people into the WildHub community. For this reason, I’d love to ask: if you’re on LinkedIn, could you actively engage with our posts there? I usually post 3 to 5 times each week, and your support (likes, shares, and comments) would make a real difference in helping us reach a wider audience. The more visibility we gain on LinkedIn, the more memberships we can drive to WildHub. And of course, I’d be more than happy to support you too — if you have any projects, articles, or work you’d like to highlight, feel free to share them on WildHub first, and I can help amplify them on LinkedIn. We’re using LinkedIn to strengthen and elevate our community’s voice, so your engagement really matters. Thanks so much for your support!

Hi everyone! One of our new members is keen to do an interview with us, and I wanted to share this opportunity here. I’m a bit tight on time at the moment and already have two interviews lined up, so I thought I’d check if anyone else might be interested in having a chat with him. His name is Marc Foggin, a seasoned conservationist and Director of Plateau Perspectives, an international NGO supporting community-led conservation and sustainable development in the mountains of Central Asia. He has extensive experience, having lived for around 18 years on the Tibetan Plateau in western China and about 6 years in Kyrgyzstan, and is now based in the Scottish Highlands. His background spans both conservation biology and development practice, and he has also worked as a consultant with IUCN, UNDP, and others. Currently, he is an Honorary Research Associate at the University of Oxford. You can read more about his work and background here: https://wildhub.community/posts/marc-foggin-communities-and-conservation-in-central-asian-mountains If you’re interested, please comment below and we can plan next steps. This could also be a fantastic first "lessons learned” opportunity for one of our newer catalysts! Thanks!

Hi everyone! Just a quick note to encourage you to jump in and engage with posts in the community when you can 😊 Conversations and shared ideas are really what make the platform valuable, and at the moment there isn’t much discussion happening yet. If you see a post that interests you, take a moment to comment, ask a question, or share your thoughts - it really helps get conversations started and makes the space feel more active and welcoming for everyone. Here are a few tips for engaging as advocates: If someone is sharing an event they’re hosting, thank them for sharing and ask a bit more about the event - people love when their initiatives are noticed. If someone is introducing themselves, ask questions to get to know them better and help them feel welcomed. If someone is sharing about new research, ask thoughtful questions or for more details - it shows their work is valued. The key is to make people feel seen and appreciated when they post. Our platform isn’t just about sharing information, it’s about building connections and supporting each other. Thanks so much for being part of this and for helping make the community thrive!

I've recently come across an article on National Geographic about designer Elle Barbeito, who is transforming Burmese python skins from Florida’s Everglades into what the media calls "luxury fashion" items. I have to admit, I was taken aback. You can read the article here: What do you do with thousands of dead Everglades phytons? Wear them. The problem with Burmese pythons in Florida is serious and well-documented. These snakes are an invasive species, reproducing rapidly with few natural predators, and their presence has devastated local wildlife, from birds and mammals to endangered species. The ecological consequences are significant, and it’s easy to understand why culling them seems like the most straightforward solution. But here’s where I find myself conflicted: the idea of taking these animals and turning them into "fashion items" - and actually profiting from them! Bear in mind that humans caused this problem in the first place: now the snakes are the ones facing death, yet humans are the ones benefiting financially from the situation. The process is marketed as a form of circular economy or sustainable fashion, framed as a creative way to turn a problem into something of value. I can’t help but wonder - should this even be allowed? I understand that rescuing thousands of phytons isn't feasible but doesn't turning them into products still feel morally unsettling? I suppose letting the bodies decompose naturally, as most snake hunters do, is probably the “best” possible solution. At least decomposition returns nutrients to the soil.  This raises a broader ethical dilemma that goes far beyond this specific case. How do we balance urgent conservation needs with respect for the lives of the animals involved? When facing an invasive species problem, is it enough to focus purely on ecological outcomes, or do we also have an ethical responsibility towards the animals at stake? Can we find solutions that are both effective and ethically sound, or are we always going to face uncomfortable compromises? I’m curious to hear your perspective: Have you encountered similar situations where conservation and ethics seem at odds? Specifically, have you heard of other cases around the world where large-scale removal of invasive species has raised similar ethical and logistical dilemmas? Do you think animal-based "fashion" marketed as circular economy can ever be reconciled with ethical conservation practices? Ultimately, this story made me realise how complex conservation solutions can be. What may seem innovative or practical can also feel uncomfortable or even morally troubling. It’s a delicate balance, and one that likely doesn’t have a single “right” answer but that’s exactly why the conversation matters. I’d love to hear your thoughts. Where do we draw the line between ethical responsibility and practical conservation? Can ethics and conservation truly coexist, or do we have to pick one over the other?

Have you ever taken a close look at a beaver dam? Logs and branches are woven into a lattice extending from streambank to bank. Able to withstand the pressure of all the water they hold back, these dams are remarkably sturdy. But while we all know beavers are skilled builders, their relationship with fish is often misunderstood. This lack of understanding by humans can result in harm to both species.  Can beavers and salmonids coexist, and even thrive together?  We will be discussing this and more on Wednesday during our WildHub Special 👉 https://wildhub.community/events/wildhub-special-balancing-the-scales-film-screening-expert-q-a  with Elliot McCandless, Communications Manager at Beaver Trust Andy Thomas, Conservation Officer at Wild Trout Trust Angelika Von Heimendahl, Beaver Reintroduction Manager at The Wildlife Trusts.  Do you have any questions you'd like us to ask our speakers? 

Conservation efforts in Africa have typically been led by "parachute conservationists", outsiders who drop in thinking they have all the answers, hire locals to implement them and then disappear. But conservationist Resson Kantai Duff has a better way to save wildlife in Africa: let locals lead these efforts themselves. She calls for a major shift in how conservation in Africa works, showing why the people closest to the land are the ones best fit to care for it. https://www.ted.com/talks/resson_kantai_duff_why_africa_needs_community_led_conservation/transcript?subtitle=en  "In Africa, the approach to conserving wildlife has almost always involved a separation of people from nature, the involvement, but never leadership, from local people. [...] The story of conservation [in Africa] has almost always then involved only a foreign scientist with a clipboard or a guy in green with a gun, there to protect that wildlife from everyone else. The rest of us have never existed in this story. And those who came to save species came from the outside. And when they came, they were labeled heroes. They had to teach local people how to live alongside wildlife on the fringes of wild lands that they once owned. [...] Conservation is about people. I have learned that the people keeping lions roaming in Kenya today are warriors, women, children and elders. They are people educated by their culture; they are urbanites with respect for that culture. And as more Africans allow co-existence to happen in our spaces, we will turn back the clock on wildlife declines and really make life better for all of us. It is time for conservation to be broad. Broad enough not just to include a species in trouble, but our land and our cultures, our innovation, our story, us. Who we were, who we are and who we want to be." - Resson Kantai Duff _________________________________________________________________ What has your experience been with community-led conservation in Africa?  I would love to hear your stories.